Wisdom, Casuistry, and the Goal of Reproductive Counseling. Two different views on wisdom and the goal of reproductive counseling are analyzed.
Saul McLeodupdated Lawrence Kohlberg agreed with Piaget's theory of moral development in principle but wanted to develop his ideas further.
In each case, he presented a choice to be considered, for example, between the rights of some authority and the needs of some deserving individual who is being unfairly treated.
Doctors said a new drug might save her. The drug had been discovered by a local chemist, and the Heinz tried desperately to buy some, but the chemist was charging ten times the money it cost to make the drug, and this was much more than the Heinz could afford.
Heinz could only raise half the money, even after help from family and friends. He explained to the chemist that his wife was dying and asked if he could have the drug cheaper or pay the rest of the money later.
The chemist refused, saying that he had discovered the drug and was going to make money from it. Kohlberg asked a series of questions such as: Should Heinz have stolen the drug?
Would it change anything if Heinz did not love his wife? What if the person dying was a stranger, would it make any difference? Should the police arrest the chemist for murder if the woman died? By studying the answers from children of different ages to these questions, Kohlberg hoped to discover how moral reasoning changed as people grew older.
The sample comprised 72 Chicago boys aged 10—16 years, 58 of whom were followed up at three-yearly intervals for 20 years Kohlberg, Each boy was given a 2-hour interview based on the ten dilemmas.
What Kohlberg was mainly interested in was not whether the boys judged the action right or wrong, but the reasons given for the decision. He found that these reasons tended to change as the children got older.
He identified three distinct levels of moral reasoning each with two sub-stages. People can only pass through these levels in the order listed. Each new stage replaces the reasoning typical of the earlier stage.
Not everyone achieves all the stages. Instead, our moral code is shaped by the standards of adults and the consequences of following or breaking their rules.
Authority is outside the individual and reasoning is based on the physical consequences of actions. Obedience and Punishment Orientation. If a person is punished, they must have done wrong.
At this stage, children recognize that there is not just one right view that is handed down by the authorities. Different individuals have different viewpoints. Level 2 - Conventional morality At the conventional level most adolescents and adultswe begin to internalize the moral standards of valued adult role models.
Authority is internalized but not questioned, and reasoning is based on the norms of the group to which the person belongs. Therefore, answers relate to the approval of others. Maintaining the Social Order. Level 3 - Post-conventional morality Individual judgment is based on self-chosen principles, and moral reasoning is based on individual rights and justice.
According to Kohlberg this level of moral reasoning is as far as most people get. That is to say, most people take their moral views from those around them and only a minority think through ethical principles for themselves.Home Musings Thinking Exercise: Heinz Dilemma (An Idea on Moral Reasoning) Musings; Thinking Exercise: Heinz Dilemma (An Idea on Moral Reasoning) By.
Annette Clarke. 0. Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development. Heinz’s dilemma was originally conceived by Jean Piaget.
KOHLBERG'S IDEAS OF MORAL REASONING. Heinz means well by trying to help his dying wife. He'll pay the druggistthe money when he is able, or accept the consequences for stealing the drug." In this case, the subject still respects the law, but places an even highervalue on loyalty to his loved ones.
This shows a desire to be a good person but. It then "diagnoses" you with one of the three stages of moral development -- pre-conventional, conventional, or post-conventional.
Throughout a series of experiments, probabilistic and truth-conditional variants of Inferentialism are investigated using new stimulus materials, which manipulate previously overlooked relevance conditions. Moral intuitionism suggests that rather than reasoning their way to moral conclusions using either deontological or consequentialist logic, people’s moral justifications are guided by visceral reactions about the rightness or wrongness of the action in question (Haidt, ).
As such, people should be inclined to embrace any justification that coheres with their moral intuitions, whether that justification . Moral Reasoning: The Moral Dilemma of “Heinz” In Europe, a lady was dying because she was very In Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning your decision is individual rights, harm and justice.
A man in New Guinea said, “If no one helped Heinz, then we are all guilty of a crime”.