Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article.
Want to start a startup? Get funded by Y Combinator. July This essay is derived from a talk at Oscon A few months ago I finished a new bookand in reviews I keep noticing words like "provocative'' and "controversial.
I was trying to make it efficient. I didn't want to waste people's time telling them things they already knew.
It's more efficient just to give them the diffs. But I suppose that's bound to yield an alarming book. Edisons There's no controversy about which idea is most controversial: I didn't say in the book that variation in wealth was in itself a good thing.
I said in some situations it might be a sign of good things. A throbbing headache is not a good thing, but it can be a sign of a good thing-- for example, that you're recovering consciousness after being hit on the head. Variation in wealth can be a sign of variation in productivity.
In a society of one, they're identical. And that is almost certainly a good thing: It's probably because you have no Thomas Edisons. In a low-tech society you don't see much variation in productivity. If you have a tribe of nomads collecting sticks for a fire, how much more productive is the best stick gatherer going to be than the worst?
A factor of two?
Whereas when you hand people a complex tool like a computer, the variation in what they can do with it is enormous. That's not a new idea. Fred Brooks wrote about it inand the study he quoted was published in But I think he underestimated the variation between programmers.
He wrote about productivity in lines of code: But what if the problem isn't given? In programming, as in many fields, the hard part isn't solving problems, but deciding what problems to solve.
Imagination is hard to measure, but in practice it dominates the kind of productivity that's measured in lines of code. Productivity varies in any field, but there are few in which it varies so much. The variation between programmers is so great that it becomes a difference in kind.
I don't think this is something intrinsic to programming, though. In every field, technology magnifies differences in productivity.
I think what's happening in programming is just that we have a lot of technological leverage. But in every field the lever is getting longer, so the variation we see is something that more and more fields will see as time goes on.
And the success of companies, and countries, will depend increasingly on how they deal with it.Racism. Every individual on earth has his completing causes; consequently an individual with perfect causes becomes perfect, and another with imperfect causes remains imperfect, as the negro who is able to receive nothing more than the human shape and speech in its least developed form.
The sociological imagination is the ability to see the relationship between individual experiences and the larger society.
C. Wright, Mills wrote an essay called “The Sociological Imagination” which had to do with how personal troubles can also tie into being societies problem. Imagination essays "The world is but a canvas to the imagination."- Henry David Thoreau.
Imagination lets one see many outlooks. Imagination is the core to creativity and knowledge. It is the structure of a mental picture that is unreal, and is not there for the senses to detect. Imagin. Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Example Of Sociological Imagination.
The essay is the most important part of a college appllication, see sample essays perfect for applying to schools in the US.
The Two Coopers. If all of Twin Peaks is the dream of some Dale Cooper outside the world of the show, what can we infer about him based on the various proxy selves and imaginary narrative he’s created?
Who is the “real” Dale Cooper? FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper—the one we know from the original Twin Peaks, who reappears briefly in The Return—is the distillation of the real Cooper.