An argument in favor of enforcing stricter gun laws in the united states of america

A Full Overview of Gun Control Share Background The gun control debate has been a political presence that can be traced back all the way to the formation of the National Rifle Association. When the NRA was first brought about, their focus was to train Union soldiers in the ways of marksmanship and instill better rifle skills. It can be argued that the first confrontation regarding gun control was when the state of New York began to oppose having the NRA practice grounds in the state. This opposition was ironically met with little opposition from the NRA, they simply moved and created new practice facilities in New Jersey.

An argument in favor of enforcing stricter gun laws in the united states of america

Last year, the small arms survey concluded that the United States has Fewer people willing to start a fight when everyone is armed?

No correlation at all? Interestingly, this turned out to be true not just for the twenty-six developed countries analyzed, but on a State-to-State level too. But statistically, the trend holds true. But study after study indicates that suicide is not so much a rational decision, but something people do on the spur of the moment—meaning that a lack of access to a death-shooting murder-stick at that critical moment could be the difference between life and death.

It might sound far-fetched, but look at the evidence: Even more worrying, people who committed suicide were found to be seventeen times more likely to live with guns at home than not.

You may recognize this as the same common-sense policy Congress recently shot down in what can only be assumed was an effort to become even more unpopular. This support for gun control, by the way, is pretty bipartisan: Instead, this research by Mother Jones scroll down halfway shows that, of those sixty-two shootings, forty-nine were perpetrated using legal weapons.

Half of all mass shooters used assault weapons or high-capacity magazines—meaning that a few sensible restrictions could have saved a heck-load of lives. So putting controls on the assault rifle has to be a good thing, right? Two weeks later, the conservative Prime Minister, John Howard, launched perhaps the most aggressive clamp-down on gun ownership in history.

Aroundautomatic and semi-automatic weapons were destroyed and a whole raft of checks and controls brought in. The first decade of the law alone saw a fifty-nine percent drop in Australian gun-homicideswhile non-firearm-related homicides stayed level.

As for mass shootings: In full, this controversial sentence reads: Many of the States distrusted each other, and everyone distrusted big government. Inthe Supreme Court even ruled that: And as Stephen King famously said: Equally, if you simply feel safer knowing that you have a shotgun in the house to defend your kids, fair enough.

Make Sure You Know Your Gun Control Arguments For and Against

According to data published in the the Guardiangun ownership in the US is literally the highest in the world. That makes Americans more heavily armed than Russians, Pakistanis and people from Afghanistan. Even Latin American countries overrun by drug cartels, with murder rates comparable to war zones—such as Colombia, Mexico, and Guatemala—have fewer guns per capita.

Even literal war zones, like Somalia and D. Congo, have less heavy weaponry.

When you feel more inclined to arm yourself than guys who live in a failed nation state where the average life expectancy is less than fifty years, it might be time to think about slowing down. If everyone was armed, no mass shooter would stand a chance, right?

When Mother Jones crunched the numbers, they found that successful interventions by armed civilians had occurred in only 1. In other words, it happened a single time in thirty years.

In two other cases, armed civilians managed to subdue a killer after the shooting had already happened, which you could argue is still a good thing.

But plenty of less-fortunate people who tried to get involved have only wound up adding to the casualty list. Infor example, Brendan McKown and Mark Wilson both tried separately to confront an armed shooter.

McKown was blasted into a coma, while Wilson was instantly killed. Training makes a hell of a difference.The United Kingdom has no gun laws, yet there are violent crimes per , and there are only violent crimes per , in America.

Kitchen knives are the common weapon of choice. Kennesaw Georgia passed a law stating required ownership of a gun in ever household. 5 Arguments in favor of Strict Gun Laws. October 1, November 5, And this is why we have come up with 5 most logical arguments in favor of more stringent gun laws in the United States of America.

By. Siddharth The Second Amendment dates back to ! The United States of America did not exist then. There were regions. According to one count, there have been mass shootings in the United States in The frequency of these shootings has led many to call for new approaches to guns and violence in America.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world and yet, in , Mexico had 11, gun murders ( gun homicides per , people) compared to the United States that had 9, gun homicides ( per , people).

An argument in favor of enforcing stricter gun laws in the united states of america

Gun laws are a heated argument. Both sides feel their argument is solid and are unwilling to yield. This sample paper argues in favor of stricter gun control.4/5(7). Gun laws are a heated argument. Both sides feel their argument is solid and are unwilling to yield.

This sample paper argues in favor of stricter gun control.4/5(7).

Why America Needs Stricter Gun Control Laws - Blog | Ultius