Famous books rewritten in the style of Donald Trump:
This should be a place for constructive conversation. Also in the cause of clarity: I did not say that the Sagan quote is a defense of theism.
Physics Police And yet the quote stands in the middle of an argument over whether or not Cosmos did justice to theism in the first episode.
In particular, we have Jerry, who agrees that Cosmos missed a chance to build bridges. If science is compatible with theism, he may have a point. But science is NOT compatible with theism! If he keeps learning more and more science, there will be less and less room for theism.
This is why theists fear science, and why Bruno was burnt at the stake. And Sagan most definitely did believe in building bridges. He had zero room for mystical nonsense—but he very much wanted to make it clear that empiricism was not the enemy of spiritualism.
Bruno is the right hero for Cosmos not only because he exemplifies this inherent conflict, but also because he was the first person since antiquity to call the stars other suns! No matter how he arrived at it, this is a fantastic idea!
You attempt to claim Sagan as a fellow religious apologist. He found in science a similar emotional joy that others derive from their faith.
I quoted Sagan on spirituality—his word, not mine—and suggested that the quote had something for both sides to consider. The responses here illustrate the delicacy of the task Sagan was attempting. But back to the subject at hand.
Bruno was not executed for believing other stars are suns at least not primarily ; his personal cosmic beliefs, innovative as they were, were not integrated into a sophisticated Copernican worldview; he was not the first to suggest that stars are other suns that was Nicolas of Cusa, a century earlier ; and he was not the first to consider an infinite expanse of stars that was Thomas Digges.
Ye Olde Statistician And Nicholas of Cusa was made a cardinal of the Church, which should indicate that the concern did not center on cosmology per se, but rather on the religious uses some people made of it.
ModernEra Sagan would be appalled at the way an entire wing of American politics is denying the findings of the entire scientific community on religious grounds.
Buddy That might come as a surprise to the Jesuits who run some of the most distinguished universities in the world, Georgetown for one.
Painting with such a broad kindergarten brush is a mark of a lazy mind. Paul Williams Science is not incompatible with the concept of a creator.
Conceptually, entertaining a creator of vast intelligence is valid. The point being asserted by Neil deGrasse Tyson is that the scale and complexity of the universe should make any idea of a creator even more grand to entertain.Famous books rewritten in the style of Donald Trump: Lord Of The Rings, Atlas Shrugged Confucianism is newly popular in China after bouncing back from its Cultural Revolution-era ban.
The government hopes to build up the philosophy as some kind of principled alternative to Western liberalism, although for now it still seems kind of forced.
History of Judaism History is of the utmost importance in Judaism. Whereas the sacred texts of most ancient religions focus on myths and philosophical concepts, the Jewish Bible is centered around historical narrative; and most Jewish holidays are intended to connect modern Jews with their historical ancestors and traditions.
Mar 17, · Judaism began as early as BCE as the religion of Abraham and of the small nation of the Hebrews. Through thousands of years of suffering, persecution, dispersion, and the occasional victory, Jewish religion . Key Jewish Facts contains the essentials which every Jew should know about Judaism.
Mar 10, · Along with his translations, Digges added commentary and new ideas, making it clear that the Copernican model was more than philosophy, it was a physically real model of the solar system.
Even standard sociological inquiries about beliefs and the history of beliefs can be found offensive simply because the attempt to rationally describe belief requires questions to be asked about how beliefs work.